Keywords
teacher in second chance education
reflectivity
self-reflective methods
discourse
discourse analysis
ethnomethodology
How to Cite
Abstract
The importance of studying the specific features of the educational environment at second chance schools is supported by the effort to create more effective tools used to introduce marginalised groups into the labour market and, in this way, make sure their socio-economic situation improves. Teachers involved in second chance education at primary and secondary schools take a role they have not been, in the course of their education or existing teaching experience, trained for and which requires that the framework of their competences is re-evaluated. The paper is aimed at suggesting a possible theoretical-methodological perspective in the studies of the teachers involved in second chance education, towards an understanding of their work in the current environment, from their viewpoint, by means of self-reflective tools, especially diaries that mirror their everyday life in educational practice. The present discourse analysis and ethnomethodology is a highly effective approach to sharing a way of constructing identification frameworks and practices in self-cognition and managing the process of education with regard to the specifics of its participants and the delicate nature of the unique and exceptional nature of individual potentials and the continuity of complex dynamics, development, and changes. The presented model of the role of a second chance teacher consists of five levels: 1) self-identification, 2) self-determination, 3) self-interpretation, 4) self-correction, and 5) self-inspiration. Individual dimensions work as discrete fields with their own life and dynamics but, at the same time, do not exclude inter-connectivity.
References
Adger, C.T. (2001). Discourse in Educational Setting. In: D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H.E. Hamilton (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 503–516). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Albert, S. & de Ruiter, J.P. (2018). Repair: The Interface between Interaction and Cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(2), 279–313. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12339.
Bajtoš, J. & Orosová, R. (2011). Mikrovyučovanie v pregraduálnej príprave učiteľov [Mickoeducation in pre-gradual preparation of teachers]. Košice: FF UPJŠ.
Beneš, M. (2008). Andragogika [Andragogy]. Praha: Grada.
Beneš, M. (2014). Andragogika [Andragogy]. 2. vyd. Praha: Grada Publishing.
Bonková, J. (2004). Ethnomethodological Approach: The Case of Degradation Practises. Sociológia, 36(4), 361–376.
Boud, D., Keogh, R. & Walker, D. (1996). Promoting Reflection in Learning: A Model. In: R. Edwards, A. Hanson & P. Raggatt (eds.), Boundaries of Adult Learning (pp. 32–56). New York: Routledge.
Burbules, N. & Bruce, B. (2001). Theory and Research on Teaching as Dialogue. In: V. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (pp. 1102–1121). Washington: American Educational Research Association.
Cheng, X. & Pan, X. (2019). English Language Teacher Learning in Professional Learning Communities: A Case Study of Chinese Secondary School. Professional Development in Education, 45(4), 698–712. DOI: 10.1080/19415257.2019.1579109.
Cosh, S. & Tully, P.J. (2014). „All I Have to Do Is Pass”: A Discursive Analysis of Student Athletes’ Talk about Prioritising Sport to the Detritment of Education to Overcome Stressors Encountered in Combining Elite Sport and Tertiary Education. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(1), 180–189. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.10.015.
Coulon, A. (1995). Ethnomethodology. Thousand Oak: Sage Publications.
Coulson, D. & Harvey, M. (2013). ‘Scaffolding Student Reflection for Experience-based Learning: A Framework’. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(4), 401–413. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2012.752726.
Coulter, J. (1991). Logic: Ethnomethodology and the Logic of Language. In: G. Button (ed.), Ethnomethodology and the Human Scenes (pp. 20–50). London: Cambridge University Press.
Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
Duranti, A. & Goodwin, C. (1992). Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Europe 2020: A Strategy for smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth (2010). Brusel: European commission, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?ur i=CELEX:52010DC2020&from=en [accessed: 20.05.2021].
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In: T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction (pp. 258–284). London: Sage.
Feranská, M. (2017). Sebareflexia ako jeden z determinantov profesíjného rozvoja učiteľa [Self-reflection as One of Professional Development of Teacher Determinant]. In: J. Králík (ed.), Evropské pedagogické fórum 2017. Koncepce vzdělávání a psychologie, ročník VII. [European Forum of Paedagogy 2017. The Conception of Education and Psychology, Vol. VII] (pp. 82–87). Hradec Králové: MAGNANIMITAS.
Foucault, M. (2002). Archeologie vědění [Archaeology of Knowledge]. Praha: Herman a synové.
Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Garfinkel, H. & Sacks, H. (1970). On the Formal Structures of Practical Actions. In: J. McKinney & E. Tiryakian (eds.), Theoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Developments (pp. 337–366). New York: Apleton-Century-Crofts.
Gee, P. & Green, J. (1998). Discourse Analysis, Learning, and Social Practice: A Methodological Study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119–169.
Gomes, M.C., Fonseca, M.F.R., Dias, M.T. & Vargas, P.G. (2010). Culture, Cognition and Language in the Constitution of Reading and Writing Practices in an Adult Literacy Classroom. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 24(3), 561–569. DOI: 10.1590/ S0102-79722011000300017.
Green, J.L., Baker, W.D., Chian, M.M., Vanderhoff, C., Hoope, L., Kelly, G., Skukauskaite, A. & Kalainoff, M.Z. (2020). Studying the Over-Time Construction of Knowledge in Educational Settings: A Microethnographic Discourse Analysis Approach. Review of Research in Education, 44, 161–194.
Grossman, R. (2008). Structures for Facilitating Student Reflection. College Teaching, 57(1), 15–22. DOI: 10.3200/CTCH.57.1.15-22.
Guzmán, A.M., Stecher, A. & Rueda, L.Í. (2016). Discoursive Psychology Contribution to Qualitative Research in Social Psychology: An Analysis of Its Ethnomethodological Heritage. Psicologia USP, 27(3), 510–520.
Habermas, J. (1974). Theory and Practice. London: Heinemann.
Harré, R. & Gillett, G.R. (2001). Diskurz a myseľ: Úvod do diskurzívnej psychológie [Discourse and Mind: An Introduction to Discursive Psychology]. Bratislava: IRIS.
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnometodology. Cambridge: Polity.
Hu, W. & Little, M. (2015). So What’s the Problem? Reflection and Reflexivity as Agents of Change. Medical Education, 49, 1174–1186. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12890.
Hupková, M. (2006). Profesijná sebareflexia učiteľa [Professional Self-reflection of Teacher]. Nitra: PF UKF.
Jalilifar, A., Khazaie, S. & Kasgari, Z.A. (2014). Critical Discourse Analysis of Teachers’ Written Diaries Genre: The Critical Thinkong Impact on Cognition in Focus. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 735–741.
Klapko, D. (2016). Diskurzivní analýza a její využití ve výzkumu edukačních jevů [Discursive Analysis and Using of It in Educational Phenomena Research]. Pedagogická orientace, 26(3), 379–414.
Končeková, Ľ. (2010). Vývinová psychológia [Developmental Psychology]. Prešov: Vydavateľstvo Michala Vaška.
Korobov, N. (2010). A Discursive Psychological Approach to Positioning. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 7, 263–277. DOI: 10.1080/14780880902822321.
Kuhn, L. (2008). Complexity and Educational Research: A Critical Reflection. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 177–189. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00398.x.
Lester, J.N. (2011). Exploring the Borders of Cognitive and Discursive Psychology: A Methodological Reconceptualization of Cognition and Discourse. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 10(3), 280–293. DOI: 10.1891/1945-8959.
Lisabonská stratégia [Lisbon Strategy] (2000). Bratislava: Ministerstvo investícií, regionálneho rozvoja a informatizácie Slovenskej republiky, https://www.mirri.gov.sk/sekcie/ cko/strategia-europa-2020/lisabonska-strategia/index.html [accessed: 15.05.2021].
Logren, A., Ruusuvuori, J. & Laitinen, J. (2017). Self-reflective Talk in Group Counselling. Discourse Studies, 19(4), 422–440. DOI: 10.1177/1461445617706771.
Lukáč, M. (2013). Dospelí a školská edukácia – od historických aspektov k aktuálnym výzvam [Adults and School Education – from Historical Aspects to Current Challenges]. In: E. Lukáč (ed.), Metamorfózy edukácie I. Zborník [Metamorphoses of Education I. Proceedings] (pp. 35–48). Prešov: Prešovská univerzita v Prešove, https:// www.pulib.sk/web/kniznica/elpub/dokument/Lukac2/subor/Lukac.pdf [accessed: 15.05.2021].
Lukáčová, S. (2013). Druhošancové vzdelávanie v nadnárodných a národných dokumentoch [Second-chance Education in Transnational and National Documents]. In: E. Lukáč (ed.), Edukácia človeka – problémy a výzvy pre 21. storočie [Human Education – Problems and Challenges for the 21st Century] (pp. 358–362). Prešov: Prešovská univerzita v Prešove, https://www.pulib.sk/web/pdf/web/viewer.html?file=/web/kniznica/ elpub/dokument/Lukac1/subor/9788055508252.pdf [accessed: 15.05.2021].
Lukáčová, S. (2017). Učiteľ ako vzdelávateľ dospelých v druhošancovom vzdelávaní odsúdených [A Teacher as an Adult Educator in the Secondary Education of Convicts]. In: I. Pavlov (ed.), Kontexty podpory profesijného rozvoja učiteľstva [Contexts to Support the Professional Development of Teachers] (pp. 129–144). Banska Bystrica: Belianum.
Machalová, M. (2006). Psychológia vo vzdelávaní dospelých [Psychology in Adult Education]. 1. ed. Bratislava: Gerlach Print.
Mann, K., Gordon, J. & MacLeod, A. (2009). Reflection and Reflective Practice in Health Professions Education: A Systematic Review. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14, 595–621.
Mascolo, M.F. (2009). Beyond Student-Centered and Teacher-Centered Pedagogy: Teaching and Learning as Guided Participation. Pedagogy and the Human Sciences, 1(1), 3–27.
Maynard, D.W. & Clayman, S.E. (1991). The Diversity of Ethnomethodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 385–418.
Mead, G.H. (1912). The Mechanism of Social Consciousness. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 9, 401–406.
Mezirow, J. (1990). How Critical Reflection Triggers Transformative Learning. In: J. Mezirow et al. (eds.), Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood (pp. 1–20). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Mezirow, J. (1998). On Critical Reflection. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(3), 185–198. DOI: 10.1177/074171369804800305.
Minor, L.C. (2002). Preservice Teachers’ Educational Beliefs and Their Perceptions of Characteristics of Effective Teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 96(2), 116–127. DOI: 10.1080/00220670209598798.
de Montigny, G. (2007). Ethnomethodology for Social Work. Qualitative Social Work, 6(1), 95–120. DOI: 10.1177/1468017318795925.
Morin, E. (2001). Seven Complex Lessons in Education for the Future. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
Orosová, R., Ganajová, M., Rozenfeld, J. & Desiatniková, L. (2018). Metódy sebareflexie v praktickej profesijnej príprave učiteľov [Methods of Self-reflection in Practical Professional Training of Teachers]. Journal of Global Science, 3(1), http://www.jogsc. com/pdf/2018/1/metody_sebareflexie.pdf [accessed: 5.05.2021].
Pereira, A. (2014). The Discursive Analysis of Body Representation: A Critical, Realistic and Embodied Overview. Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 13(1), 75–92. DOI: 10.1386/pjss.13.1.75_1.
Petlák, E. (2019). Motivácia v edukačnom procese [Motivation in the Educational Process]. Bratislava: Wolters Kluwer.
Pilouras, P., Plakitsi, K. & Nasis, G. (2015). Discourse Analysis of Science Teachers Talk as Self-reflective Tool for Promoting Effective NOS Teaching. World Journal of Education, 5(6), 96–107.
Průcha, J. (1997). Moderní pedagogika [Modern Pedagogy]. Praha: Portal.
Průcha, J., Walterová, E. & Mareš, J. (1995). Pedagogický slovník [Pedagogical Dictionary]. Praha: Praha Portál.
Raffel, S. (2007). Self-Reflective Rule-Following. Culture and Oreganization, 13(4), 327–335.
Ritzer, G. (1993). The McDonaldization of Society. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
Ryan, M. (2012). Conceptualising and Teaching Discursive and Performative Reflection in Higher Education. Studies in Continuing Education, 34(2), 207–223. DOI: 10.1080/0158037X.2011.611799.
Sacks, H. (1963). On Sociological Description. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 8, 1–16.
Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on Conversation, Vol. 1–2. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Samuels, M. & Betts, J. (2007). Crossing the Threshold from Description to Deconstruction: Using Self-assessment to Deepen Reflection. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 8(2), 269–283. DOI: 10.1080/14623940701289410.
Sandars, J. (2009). The Use of Reflection in Medical Education: AMEE Guide No. 44. Medical Teacher, 31, 685–695. DOI: 10.1080/01421590903050374.
Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D. & Hamilton, H. (eds.) (2001). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
Schon, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sedláková, M. (2018). Potenciál diskurzivní analýzy a vizuální metodologie v postmoderním paradigmatu vědy [The Potential of Discursive Analysis and Visual Methodology in the Postmodern Paradigm of Science]. Pedagogická orientace, 28(1), 163–180. DOI: 10.5817/PedOr2018-1-163.
Semetsky, I. (2005). Not by Breadth Alone: Imaging a Slf-organised Classroom. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 2(1), 19–36.
Švec, Š. (2008). Anglicko-slovenský lexikón pedagogiky a andragogiky [English-Slovak Lexicon of Pedagogy and Andragogy]. Bratislava: Iris.
Tal, C. (2012). Discourse and Reflection Competencies Developed by Student Teachers through Repeated Children’s Book Read Alouds: A Multiple Case Study. ISRN Education, 2012, 1–10, http://downloads.hindawi.com/archive/2012/308198.pdf [accessed: 23.05.2021].
Vágnerová, M. (2012). Vývojová psychológie [Developmental Psychology]. 2. ed. Praha: Karolinum.
Waring, H.Z. (2014). Mentor Invitations for Reflection in Post-observation Conferences: Some Preliminary Considerations. Applied Linguistics Review, 5(1), 99–123.
Washington, R.O. (1982). Social Development: A Focus for Practice and Education. Social Work, 27(1), 104–109. DOI: 10.1093/sw/27.1.104.
Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the Mind: A Sociokultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wiegerová, A. & Lampertová, A. (2012). Denník učiteľa ako výskumný nástroj [Teacher’s Diary as a Research Tool]. Kvalita ve vzdělávání, Sborník konference České asociace pedagogického výzkumu, http://www.capv.cz/index.php/cz/2012/39-sborniky-capv/archiv-sborniku/2012/200-dennik-ucitela-ako-vy-skumny-nastroj [accessed: 30.04.2021].
York, C.S., Yamagata-Lynch, L.C. & Smaldino, S.E. (2016). Adult Reflection in a Graduate-level Online Distance Education Course. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 17(1), 40–58. DOI: 10.1080/14623943.2015.1123686.
In accordance with the recommendation of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education, which aims to counteract the practice of “ghostwriting” and “guest authorship,” all authors submitting their text for publication should attach an author’s statement which declares the contribution of each of the authors to the article. The printed and signed statement should be delivered by mail or other means to editor-in-chief Joanna Skibska or sent in the form of a scan to the following e-mail address: redakcja@kontekstypedagogczne.pl. The authors will not receive remuneration for publishing their papers. The editors reserve the right to make minor editorial changes to the articles which will not affect the substance of the article. We encourage all authors to prepare their articles in accordance with the guidelines for manuscript preparation. Download pdf file.
Authors transfer all copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree to the publishing of their email addresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.