Beneficial Effects of Growth Mindset of Intelligence and Growth Mindset of Personality on Academic Achievement in School-Aged Children
Konteksty Pedagogiczne nr 2(15)/2020
pdf

Keywords

implicit theories of intelligence
growth mindset of intelligence
growth mindset of personality
grit
academic performance

How to Cite

FOX, C.; BARRERA, M. Beneficial Effects of Growth Mindset of Intelligence and Growth Mindset of Personality on Academic Achievement in School-Aged Children. Pedagogical Contexts, [S. l.], v. 2, n. 15, p. 25–40, 2020. DOI: 10.19265/kp.2020.2.15.267. Disponível em: https://kontekstypedagogiczne.pl/kp/article/view/267. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2024.

Abstract

Multiple research studies revealed the benefits of adopting a growth mindset of intelligence for students of all ages. However, few studies have investigated the advantage of having a growth mindset of personality or having grit on academic performance. Therefore, this study investigated the influence of grit and implicit theories of intelligence and personality on academic performance in fifth through eighth-grade students. Our hypothesis is that a relatively higher level of grit as well as a growth mindset would result in better academic success. Students were tested in their respective classrooms using questionnaires for grit, mindset of intelligence and mindset of personality. Quarter grades and standardized scores were obtained for all students on topics such as English, reading, language, math and science. Growth mindset of intelligence and growth mindset of personality provided a selective advantage academically to students on classroom grades and on standardized testing, particularly in verbal areas such as English, reading and language. Furthermore, mindset of intelligence predicted significant change in standardized math scores. Grit did not affect academic performance. Our results suggest that educational institutions would benefit from mindset interventions promoting a growth mindset of intelligence and personality in students.

https://doi.org/10.19265/kp.2020.2.15.267
pdf

References

Ahmavaara, A. & Houston, D.M. (2007). The effects of selective schooling and self-concept on adolescents’ academic aspiration: An examination of Dweck’s self-theory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 613–632. DOI: 10.1348/000709906X120132.

Alan, S., Boneva T. & Ertac, S. (2016). Ever Failed, Try Again, Succeed Better: Results from a Randomized Educational Intervention on Grit. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2761390.

Blackwell, L.S., Trzesniewski, K.H. & Dweck, C.S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467- 8624.2007.00995.

Bostwick, K.C.P., Collie, R.J., Martin, A.J. & Durksen, T.L. (2017). Students’ growth mindsets, goals, and academic outcomes in mathematics. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 225(2), 107–116. DOI: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000287.

Canning, E.A., Muenks, K., Green, D.J. & Murphy, M.C. (2019). STEM faculty who believe ability is fixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire less student motivation in their classes. Science Advances, 5(2). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aau4734.

Cosgrove, J.M., Chen, Y.T. & Castelli, D.M. (2018). Physical Fitness, Grit, School Attendance, and Academic Performance among Adolescents. Biomed Research International, 2018, 9801258. DOI: 10.1155/2018/9801258.

Duckworth, A. (2016). Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance. New York, NY: Scribner.

Dweck, C.S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Washington: Psychology press.

Dweck, C.S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success: How we can learn to fulfill our potential. New York: Ballantine Books.

Embree, M.C. (1986). Implicit Personality Theory in the Classroom: An Integrative Approach. Teaching of Psychology, 13(2), 78. DOI: 10.1207/s15328023top1302_7.

Leondari, A. & Gialamas, V. (2002). Implicit Theories, Goal Orientations, and Perceived Competence: Impact on Students’ Achievement Behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 279–291. DOI: 10.1002/pits.10035.

Li, S., Zhao, F. & Yu, G. (2019). Ostracism and aggression among adolescents: Implicit theories of personality moderated the mediating effect of self-esteem. Children & Youth Services Review, 100, 105–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.02.043.

Miller-Matero, L.R., Martinez, S., MacLean, L., Yaremchuk, K. & Ko, A.B. (2018). Grit: A predictor of medical student performance. Education for Health, 31(2), 109–113. DOI: 10.4103/efh.EfH_152_16.

Ng, A.S. & Tong, E.M.W. (2013). The relation between implicit theories of personality and forgiveness. Personal Relationships, 20(3), 479–494. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475- 6811.2012.01419.x.

O’Dell, D.H. (2017). The Debugging Mind-Set. Communications of the ACM, 60(6), 40–45.

Renaud, J. & McConnell, A. (2007). Wanting to be better but thinking you can’t: Implicit theories of personality moderate the impact of self-discrepancies on self-esteem. Self & Identity, 6(1), 41–50. DOI: 10.1145/3052939.

Renaud-Dubé, A., Guay, F., Talbot, D., Taylor, G. & Koestner, R. (2015). The Relations between Implicit Intelligence Beliefs, Autonomous Academic Motivation, and School Persistence Intentions: A Mediation Model. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 18(2), 255–272. DOI: 10.1007/s11218-014-9288-0.

Salekin, R.T., Lester, W.S. & Sellers, M.-K. (2012). Mental sets in conduct problem youth with psychopathic features: entity versus incremental theories of intelligence. Law and Human Behavior, 36(4), 283–292. DOI: 10.1037/h0093971.

Scott, D. et al. (2014). The Far-Reaching Effects of Believing People Can Change: Implicit Theories of Personality Shape Stress, Health, and Achievement During Adolescence. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 106(6), 867–884. DOI: 10.1037/a0036335.

Shih, S. (2011). Perfectionism, Implicit Theories of Intelligence, and Taiwanese Eighth- Grade Students’ Academic Engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 104(2), 131–142. DOI: 10.1080/00220670903570368.

Shively, R.L. & Ryan, C.S. (2013). Longitudinal Changes in College Math Students’ Implicit Theories of Intelligence. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 16(2), 241–256. DOI: 10.1007/s11218-012-9208-0.

Sisk, V.F., Burgoyne, A.P., Sun, J., Butler, J.L. & Macnamara, B.N. (2018). To What Extent and Under Which Circumstances Are Growth Mind-Sets Important to Academic Achievement? Two Meta-Analyses. Psychological Science, 29(4), 549–571. DOI: 10.1177/0956797617739704.

Suran, L. & Young Woo, S. (2017). Effects of grit on academic achievement and career-related attitudes of college students in Korea. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 45(10), 1629–1642. DOI: 10.2224/sbp.6400.

Tovar-García, E.D. (2017). The impact of perseverance and passion for long term goals (GRIT) on educational achievements of migrant children: Evidence from Tatarstan, Russia. Psicología Educativa, 23(1), 19–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.pse.2017.02.003.

Wang, A.Y. (1997). Making implicit personality theories explicit: A classroom demonstration. Teaching of Psychology, 24(4), 258–261. DOI: 10.1207/s15328023top2404_6.

Yeager, D.S., Miu, A.S., Powers, J. & Dweck, C.S. (2013). Implicit theories of personality and attributions of hostile intent: A meta-analysis, an experiment, and a longitudinal Intervention. Child Development, 84(5), 1651–1667. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12062.

Yeager, D.S., Trzesniewski, K.H. & Dweck, C.S. (2013). An implicit theories of personality intervention reduces adolescent aggression in response to victimization and exclusion. Child Development, 84(3), 970–988. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12003.

Yeager, D.S., Lee, H.Y. & Jamieson, J.P. (2016). How to Improve Adolescent Stress Responses: Insights from Integrating Implicit Theories of Personality and Biopsychosocial Models. Psychological Science, 27(8), 1078–1091. DOI: 10.1177/0956797616649604.

Yeager, D.S. (2017). Dealing with Social Difficulty During Adolescence: The Role of Implicit Theories of Personality. Child Development Perspectives, 11(3), 196–201. DOI: 10.1111/cdep.12234.

In accordance with the recommendation of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education, which aims to counteract the practice of “ghostwriting” and “guest authorship,” all authors submitting their text for publication should attach an author’s statement which declares the contribution of each of the authors to the article. The printed and signed statement should be delivered by mail or other means to editor-in-chief Joanna Skibska or sent in the form of a scan to the following e-mail address: redakcja@kontekstypedagogczne.pl. The authors will not receive remuneration for publishing their papers. The editors reserve the right to make minor editorial changes to the articles which will not affect the substance of the article. We encourage all authors to prepare their articles in accordance with the guidelines for manuscript preparation. Download pdf file.

Authors transfer all copyrights and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree to the publishing of their email addresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.